Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Montz v. Pilgrim Films & Television, Inc., 08-56954 (2010)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Number: 08-56954 Visitors: 10
Judges: Kozinski
Filed: Sep. 30, 2010
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: 623 F.3d 912 (2010) Larry MONTZ; Daena Smoller, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. PILGRIM FILMS & TELEVISION, INC.; NBC Universal, Inc.; Craig Piligian; Jason Conrad Hawes; Universal Television Networks, Defendants-Appellees. No. 08-56954. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. September 30, 2010. Graham Bruce Lippsmith, Joseph Christopher Gjonola, Girardi & Keese, Los Angeles, CA, for Plaintiffs-Appellants. Gail Migdal Title, Esquire, Joel Robert Weiner, Esquire, Gloria C. Franke, Esquire, Katt
More
623 F.3d 912 (2010)

Larry MONTZ; Daena Smoller, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
PILGRIM FILMS & TELEVISION, INC.; NBC Universal, Inc.; Craig Piligian; Jason Conrad Hawes; Universal Television Networks, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 08-56954.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

September 30, 2010.

Graham Bruce Lippsmith, Joseph Christopher Gjonola, Girardi & Keese, Los Angeles, CA, for Plaintiffs-Appellants.

Gail Migdal Title, Esquire, Joel Robert Weiner, Esquire, Gloria C. Franke, Esquire, Katten Muchin Rosenman, LLP, Los Angeles, CA, for Defendants-Appellees.

ORDER

KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer